Stay informed with our newsletter.

Icon
Interviews & Expert Views
July 1, 2025

Expert Views on Capital Flows and Corporate Decarbonizations

This article explores expert perspectives on the growing connection between capital flows and corporate decarbonization. As global investors increasingly prioritize ESG criteria, capital is being redirected toward sustainable, low-carbon ventures. At the same time, corporations are setting ambitious decarbonization targets to align with climate goals and attract investment. Experts emphasize the importance of transparent disclosures, supportive policies, and innovative financing tools to drive meaningful progress in transitioning to a low-carbon economy.

As the global economy transitions towards a low-carbon future, two major financial dynamics are taking center stage, capital flows and corporate decarbonization. These forces are increasingly interlinked as investors seek sustainable growth and corporations face mounting pressure to align with climate goals. Policymakers, investors, and business leaders are re-evaluating traditional models of capital allocation, placing greater emphasis on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics, especially carbon footprints. This article delves into expert opinions on how capital flows are evolving in response to climate imperatives and how corporations are responding with ambitious decarbonization strategies.

The Shift in Capital Flows: A Sustainable Realignment

Experts across financial institutions agree that capital flows are being realigned towards sustainable assets. According to Dr. Ma Jun, Chairman of the China Green Finance Committee and a leading figure in sustainable finance, “Global capital markets are undergoing a structural shift. Green and sustainable finance is no longer niche, it is becoming mainstream. Investors increasingly demand transparency and climate-aligned portfolios.”

The International Energy Agency (IEA) reports that in 2023, clean energy investments surpassed fossil fuel investments for the first time, reaching over $1.7 trillion globally. Much of this capital flowed into sectors like renewable energy, electric vehicles, and energy-efficient technologies. Institutional investors, sovereign wealth funds, and private equity firms are recalibrating their portfolios to meet net-zero commitments.

Mark Carney, former Governor of the Bank of England and UN Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance, emphasizes the importance of aligning financial systems with climate goals. He notes, “Every financial decision must take climate into account. The goal is not just financing green, but greening finance.”

The Role of ESG in Driving Capital Decisions

The rise of ESG investing has significantly influenced capital allocation. According to Morningstar, global ESG funds attracted more than $400 billion in new capital in 2023 alone. Asset managers are integrating ESG criteria into investment models, and climate risk assessments are becoming standard practice.

Kristina Wyatt, former SEC climate risk official and Chief Sustainability Officer at Persefoni, points out that investors now expect rigorous climate disclosures. “The days of vague sustainability promises are over. Investors demand quantifiable, science-based targets. Transparency in emissions, carbon offsets, and transition plans is critical.”

In response, regulatory bodies like the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) are implementing climate disclosure requirements. This pushes companies to report Scope 1, 2, and increasingly, Scope 3 emissions, direct, indirect, and value chain-related carbon outputs.

Corporate Decarbonization: Ambition Meets Action

As capital flows increasingly favor low-carbon investments, companies are compelled to step up their decarbonization efforts. Leading corporations are setting science-based targets, investing in renewable energy, and redesigning supply chains to reduce carbon intensity.

Dr. Fatih Birol, Executive Director of the IEA, underscores the importance of corporate action. “Without strong decarbonization commitments from the corporate sector, it will be nearly impossible to meet the 1.5°C climate goal. Companies must be part of the solution, not the problem.”

Companies like Apple, Microsoft, and Unilever have committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2030 or sooner. Microsoft, for instance, aims to be carbon negative by 2030 and remove all its historical emissions by 2050. This involves not just internal reductions but also investments in carbon removal technologies.

PwC’s 2024 CEO Survey revealed that 64% of global CEOs see climate change as a key driver of transformation in the next five years. Yet, only 39% say they have embedded decarbonization into their core business strategies. This gap between awareness and action is where expert insights are most valuable.

Financing the Transition: Challenges and Opportunities

Despite the momentum, financing the transition to a low-carbon economy remains challenging. According to the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI), the annual climate finance gap exceeds $2.5 trillion. Developing nations, in particular, struggle to attract the necessary investments due to policy uncertainty, currency risk, and lack of green financial infrastructure.

Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Director-General of the World Trade Organization, highlights the issue: “For capital to flow efficiently into sustainable infrastructure in emerging markets, we need greater international collaboration and risk mitigation mechanisms. Blended finance and public-private partnerships will play a key role.”

Experts also call for innovation in financial instruments. Green bonds, sustainability-linked loans, and transition finance mechanisms are helping bridge funding gaps. Transition finance, in particular, enables high-emission industries like steel, cement, and aviation to decarbonize gradually while maintaining access to capital.

Dr. Rhian-Mari Thomas, CEO of the Green Finance Institute, says, “We must fund the grey-to-green transition. Ignoring carbon-intensive sectors won’t solve the climate crisis. Instead, we need financial tools that incentivize cleaner production pathways.”

The Interplay Between Policy and Capital Flow

Experts stress that policy frameworks significantly influence capital flows. The European Union’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and EU Taxonomy are guiding principles for sustainable investment. Meanwhile, the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act and Japan’s GX (Green Transformation) Strategy offer substantial incentives for corporate decarbonization.

Nick Robins, Professor of Sustainable Finance at the London School of Economics, explains, “Capital flows don’t occur in a vacuum. Policy signals, carbon pricing, and regulatory clarity shape investor confidence. Governments must provide the scaffolding for private finance to scale decarbonization.”

Moreover, central banks are incorporating climate risk into monetary policy and financial stability assessments. The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS), comprising over 130 central banks, is pushing for scenario-based stress testing and integrating climate into macroprudential regulation.

Looking Ahead: What Experts Recommend

1. Standardization of Climate Disclosures:
Experts advocate for globally harmonized disclosure frameworks. The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) is working to unify reporting standards, which would enhance investor confidence and capital mobilization.

2. Strengthening Carbon Markets:
Voluntary and compliance-based carbon markets must become more transparent and credible. High-integrity carbon credits can unlock funding for nature-based solutions and innovation.

3. Inclusive Capital Mobilization:
Experts emphasize ensuring that small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and developing countries are not left behind. Capacity-building, concessional finance, and technical assistance are key.

4. Decarbonization as Strategy, Not CSR:
Experts agree that decarbonization must be embedded into corporate strategy, not treated as a corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiative. Linking executive compensation to emission reduction targets is one suggested approach.

Conclusion

Capital flows and corporate decarbonization are now two sides of the same climate coin. As financial institutions align with net-zero goals, capital is flowing toward companies demonstrating environmental responsibility and climate resilience. At the same time, businesses are rethinking their operating models to remain competitive and relevant in a carbon-constrained world.

The collective insight from global experts points to a future where finance drives climate action, and corporations lead the charge toward decarbonization. Yet, the journey demands coordinated action, transparent metrics, innovative finance, and bold leadership. Only then can the world hope to meet the dual goals of economic prosperity and climate stability.

For questions or comments write to contactus@bostonbrandmedia.com

Stay informed with our newsletter.